|
|
|
| About Hodgson Russ | Practice Areas | Attorneys & Other Professionals | News & Seminars | Careers | Offices |
 |
|
7 Steps to Take Before Saying “You’re Fired” ADA has implications for food service industry ADA limits questions employers can ask about health, disabilities Anti-Discrimination in Employment: Retaliation Gets Personal Applying out-of-state taxes to retirement stock options Asking potential new employees certain personal questions may not be legal Background checks part 2: The Fair Credit Reporting Act Converting Florida LLCs into Corps Cross-Border Estate Planning Basics Cross-Border Income Securities Employers, be wary: Court widened meaning of 'retaliation' |
Home > Offices > Boca Raton, FL > Articles > Employers, be wary: Court widened meaning of 'retaliation' Employers, be wary: Court widened meaning of 'retaliation'
This article originally appeared in the July 18-19, 2006 edition of Boca Raton News, www.bocanews.com. Reprinted with permission. The U.S. Supreme Court resolved a difference of opinion as to what actions constitute prohibited retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court made it clear that retaliatory actions include much more than ultimate employment actions, such as terminations, compensation decisions, and promotions. In their weekly Boca Raton News column, Hodgson Russ partners Larry Corman and Glenn Rissman discuss examples of accomodations employers must make to make facilities readily accessible to and usable by person with disabilities. Please click on the PDF link above to view the full article ... |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
