|
Intellectual Property & Technology
2005-2008 Articles
- Supreme Court Raises Bar for Patents in KSR
-
Jun-04-2007
— On April 30, the Supreme Court issued a significant patent law decision in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. concerning how an invention should be evaluated to determine if it is entitled to patent protection.
- ‘What Do You Mean I Paid for It, but Don't Own It?’
-
Jul-25-2005
— With more and more business activity involving the creation of important work product that can be protected with a copyright, there needs to be more awareness of how ownership of works made for hire is treated.
- Think Small—Really Small
-
Jul-25-2005
— Nanotechnology is the science of creating and manipulating very small things. The impact of nanotechnology can be astronomical, and the ability to obtain patents in this arena is central to the magnitude of that impact.
- Second Circuit Update
-
Jun-06-2005
— A brief review of recent notable decisions from the Second Circuit, including cases involving arbitration, electronic privacy, securities litigation, and trademark and copyright infringement.
- A New Year’s Resolution — Time to Shape Up Your Assets
-
Mar-29-2005
— Your intellectual property (IP) assets are the essence of your business. They embody what your company stands for. It’s your logo, the literature and articles you’ve written, the inventions you’ve created, or the software your company has developed.
- Copyright Registration for Web Sites
-
Mar-29-2005
— While the U.S. Copyright Office has been somewhat slow in adopting precise criteria for gaining copyright protection in Web sites, such protection is available by obtaining a “copyright registration” for the site.
- IP Developments March 2005
-
Mar-29-2005
— Topics include reviewing your IP assets, filing continuation applications, recent devlopments in patent claim construction, and copyright registration for Web sites
- Many Patents Are Now Subject to a New Ground for Attack
-
Mar-29-2005
— The practice of filing continuation applications has been used by patent attorneys as a part of filing strategies on behalf of their clients for many years. A recent decision by the Federal Circuit has cast a shadow over many continuation practices.
|
|
|
|
