|
![]() |
| About Hodgson Russ | Practice Areas | Attorneys & Other Professionals | News & Seminars | Careers | Offices |
|
Refusal to submit to search can bring termination Impediments to winning a ‘retaliation lawsuit’ Employers should keep 'paper trail' to justify certain actions 7 Steps to Take Before Saying “You’re Fired” ADA has implications for food service industry ADA limits questions employers can ask about health, disabilities Anti-Discrimination in Employment: Retaliation Gets Personal Asking potential new employees certain personal questions may not be legal Background checks part 2: The Fair Credit Reporting Act Documentation can be an employer’s best friend Does the right to privacy exist in the workplace? Dress code, religious beliefs require 'reasonable accommodations' Employers must be cautious when reporting worker ethnicity to Feds Employers must make 'accommodations' for disabled Employers obligated to keep certain worker records Employers should prepare for H-1B filing season starting April 1 Employers should use common sense to avoid harassment suits Employers use loopholes to beat anti sex-discrimination laws Employers, be wary: Court widened meaning of 'retaliation' Ex-workers may sue over negative comments by former employer Florida courts take liberal interpretation of employee ‘misconduct’ FMLA requires time off for specific reasons Form I-9 can be a catch-22 for most employers Guidelines for creating employee handbooks Harassment is unacceptable employers must put it in writing Holiday parties do not give workers an excuse to break fraternization rules How to protect against wrongful termination lawsuits How unemployment compensation affects workers who voluntarily quit Know Florida's minimum wage law Office romances may touch the heart, but enflame employer liability Office romances: Legal and practical implications affecting the bottom line Prevent ex-employees from sharing trade secrets with competitors Questions to job interviewees should be strictly job-related Requiring an employee to arbitrate disputes isn’t easy Seven steps before saying, 'You're fired' Sexual harassment must be prohibited in the workplace Social Security 'no-match letters' carry new impact State, federal laws regulate what you can ask at a job interview Ten Tips to Prevent Identity Theft Veterans' re-employment rights Weighty issue of morbid obesity, protection from discrimination What employers need to know about lie detector tests Documentation can be an employer’s best friend - part 2 Courts seeing increase in religious discrimination suits Non-Compete Statutes Under Florida Law Medical data, health check may be needed to get leave time English-only policies have narrow application in the workplace Employers should have policies banning violence Respond properly to employee complaints of sexual harassment Federal minimum wage increase has little impact on Florida Leave for Victims of Domestic Violence Under new law, firms must grant leave to domestic abuse victims Workers' compensation a defense to certain workplace torts Employees have legally protected personal characteristics Interviewing job applicants without violating discrimination laws is a must New DHS Rules Re: Employer Handling of Social Security No-Match Letters What employers should do with Social Security ‘No Match’ letters ‘Green cards’ with no expiration date must be replaced Uncle Scrooge's Advice for Office Holiday Parties Responding to Employee Sexual Harassment Complaints Article by Glenn M. Rissman Looks at Construction-Industry Layoffs |
Articles > Leave for Victims of Domestic Violence Leave for Victims of Domestic ViolenceEffective July 1, 2007, a new law went into effect in Florida that requires employers of fifty or more employees to provide a leave of absence to employees who are the victims of domestic violence. To our knowledge, the law is the only Florida statute mandating private sector employers to provide employees with leave. Although the new law applies to employers who have fifty or more employees, the statute does not mandate that the fifty employees be located in Florida. Until there is a clarification through administrative rules or case law, employers with fifty or more employees should heed the statute’s mandate, even if the number of employees actually located in Florida is less than fifty. To be eligible for the leave, the employee must have been employed by the employer for three or more months. Again, the statute is somewhat unclear whether the employee must have been employed for three months at the time of the request for leave or at the time the leave commences. Until there is a clarification, employers may wish to provide the most favorable and broad interpretation of the statute to the requesting employee. The statute requires the covered employer to permit an eligible employee to request and take up to three working days of leave in any twelve month period if the employee or a family or household member of the employee is a victim of domestic violence. The employee taking the leave must first exhaust all annual or vacation leave, personal leave, and sick leave which is available to the employee, unless the employer waives the requirement to exhaust other accrued leave. The three days’ leave under the statute is either paid or unpaid, at the employer’s discretion. The statute permits the employee to take the three days’ leave for specifically enumerated reasons: The employee must provide the employer with appropriate advance notice, as required by the employer’s policy, except in cases of imminent danger. The employer may also require that the employee requesting leave provide documentation establishing the act of domestic violence. Presumably, a police report, court hearing or trial notice, or subpoena would suffice. The employer, in turn, must keep all information relating to the employee’s leave confidential. Employers may not interfere with the employee’s exercise of her or his rights under the statute. Similarly, employers may not discharge, demote, suspend, retaliate or otherwise discriminate against an employee for exercising her or his rights under the statute. An employee who believes her or his rights were violated may bring a civil suit for damages and equitable relief in state circuit court. The aggrieved employee may seeks as damages all wages and benefits that would have been due to the employee but for the violation of the statute. If they have not done so already, covered employers should draft and implement a policy governing leave under the new statute. Because of the similarity in many respects to the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, Florida employers may wish to review their FMLA leave policies when adopting a policy under the new statute to ensure consistency in their leave policies and practices. By: Larry Corman and Glenn M. Rissman Larry Corman and Glenn M. Rissman are partners at the law firm of Hodgson Russ LLP in Boca Raton. Mr. Corman received his juris doctorate from Harvard Law School and concentrates his practice in employment discrimination litigation, commercial litigation, deceptive trade practices, covenants not to compete, and transactional fraud areas. Mr. Rissman received his juris doctorate, with honors, from the University of Florida College of Law and concentrates his practice primarily on labor and employment litigation and employment-based immigration and naturalization. The above article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice as to any specific matter. You should not act solely upon this information without consulting legal or other professional advice. |
|
|
|