|
![]() |
| About Hodgson Russ | Practice Areas | Attorneys & Other Professionals | News & Seminars | Careers | Offices |
|
Refusal to submit to search can bring termination Impediments to winning a ‘retaliation lawsuit’ Employers should keep 'paper trail' to justify certain actions 7 Steps to Take Before Saying “You’re Fired” ADA has implications for food service industry ADA limits questions employers can ask about health, disabilities Anti-Discrimination in Employment: Retaliation Gets Personal Asking potential new employees certain personal questions may not be legal Background checks part 2: The Fair Credit Reporting Act Documentation can be an employer’s best friend Does the right to privacy exist in the workplace? Dress code, religious beliefs require 'reasonable accommodations' Employers must be cautious when reporting worker ethnicity to Feds Employers must make 'accommodations' for disabled Employers obligated to keep certain worker records Employers should prepare for H-1B filing season starting April 1 Employers should use common sense to avoid harassment suits Employers use loopholes to beat anti sex-discrimination laws Employers, be wary: Court widened meaning of 'retaliation' Ex-workers may sue over negative comments by former employer Florida courts take liberal interpretation of employee ‘misconduct’ FMLA requires time off for specific reasons Form I-9 can be a catch-22 for most employers Guidelines for creating employee handbooks Harassment is unacceptable employers must put it in writing Holiday parties do not give workers an excuse to break fraternization rules How to protect against wrongful termination lawsuits How unemployment compensation affects workers who voluntarily quit Know Florida's minimum wage law Office romances may touch the heart, but enflame employer liability Office romances: Legal and practical implications affecting the bottom line Prevent ex-employees from sharing trade secrets with competitors Questions to job interviewees should be strictly job-related Requiring an employee to arbitrate disputes isn’t easy Seven steps before saying, 'You're fired' Sexual harassment must be prohibited in the workplace Social Security 'no-match letters' carry new impact State, federal laws regulate what you can ask at a job interview Ten Tips to Prevent Identity Theft Veterans' re-employment rights Weighty issue of morbid obesity, protection from discrimination What employers need to know about lie detector tests Documentation can be an employer’s best friend - part 2 Courts seeing increase in religious discrimination suits Non-Compete Statutes Under Florida Law Medical data, health check may be needed to get leave time English-only policies have narrow application in the workplace Employers should have policies banning violence Respond properly to employee complaints of sexual harassment Federal minimum wage increase has little impact on Florida Leave for Victims of Domestic Violence Under new law, firms must grant leave to domestic abuse victims Workers' compensation a defense to certain workplace torts Employees have legally protected personal characteristics Interviewing job applicants without violating discrimination laws is a must New DHS Rules Re: Employer Handling of Social Security No-Match Letters What employers should do with Social Security ‘No Match’ letters ‘Green cards’ with no expiration date must be replaced Uncle Scrooge's Advice for Office Holiday Parties Responding to Employee Sexual Harassment Complaints Article by Glenn M. Rissman Looks at Construction-Industry Layoffs |
Articles > Veterans' re-employment rights Veterans' re-employment rightsThe following article was originally published in the April 17, 2006 edition of Boca Raton/Delray Beach News. Reprinted with permission. Q: Some of our employees are reservists or members of the National Guard who were called up for active duty. With the prospect of our troops returning home, what are my obligations to these employees? A: The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Act (USERRA) prohibits employers from discriminating against past and present members of the uniformed services and establishes reemployment rights for service members who want to return to the jobs they held prior to uniformed service. The Department of Labor recently published regulations to explain and clarify USERRA. Below is a summary of an employer’s rights and obligations and the rights and obligations of the service member under USERRA. USERRA covers all categories of military training and service, including duty performed on an voluntary or involuntary basis, in peace or war. Among others, USERRA applies to National Guard and reserve military personnel. USERRA makes it unlawful to deny initial employment, reemployment, retention in employment, promotion or any other benefit of employment to an individual because he or she performed military service or applied to perform service in the uniformed services. An employer may not discriminate against a person who served in the military because of service in the military. Of course, in the case of initial employment, if the individual is not qualified for the position in question or there is a more qualified applicant for the job, a private employer is under no obligation to give a preference to the military veteran. (State employers may have to provide a veteran’s preference to military veterans.) The most significant impact of USERRA is the returning veteran’s right to reemployment with the prior to uniformed service employer. Although there are exceptions, in general, if an employee has been absent from a position of civilian employment because of service in the uniformed services, he or she will be eligible for reemployment. Eligibility for reemployment is based on several factors: 1. The employer had advance notice of the employee’s service; 3. The employee timely returns to work or applies for reemployment; and 4. The employee has not been separated from service with a disqualifying discharge or under other than honorable conditions. Prior notice The employee, or an appropriate officer of the uniformed service, must provide the employer with as much advance notice of the need for leave as is reasonable under the circumstances. The notice does not have to be in writing. Further, notice is not required if prevented by military necessity or is otherwise impossible or unreasonable under the circumstances. At the time the employee leaves for uniformed service, he or she does not have to tell the employer that he or she intends to seek reemployment after completing uniformed service. Notice upon return from service Once the employee completes his or her service in the uniformed services, the employee must notify the pre-service employer of his or her intent to return to the employment position by either reporting to work or submitting an application for reemployment. How soon the employee must report back to work or apply for reemployment depends upon the employee’s length of uniformed service. If the employee is eligible for reemployment, the employer has few defenses excusing it from the obligations to reemploy the returning employee. Only if the employer can show that its circumstances have so changed to make reemployment impossible or unreasonable can the employer refuse to reemploy an otherwise eligible employee. Benefits while on leave While the employee is away, the employer must treat the employee as on leave or on furlough for all non-seniority benefits. The employee must be given the most favorable treatment accorded to any comparable form of leave. Thus, if an employer continues the accrual of vacation or sick leave for an employee on leave, the employee on leave for service in the uniformed services must also receive such benefit. The employee away for service in the uniform services may also request to use any accrued leave with pay (with the exception of sick leave) during the period of employment to continue his or her civilian pay. The employee is also entitled to elect to continue group coverages under COBRA. USERRA’s escalator provision The returning employee is entitled to the reemployment in the job position he or she would have attained with reasonable certainty if not for the absence due to uniformed service. Thus, if not for the uniformed service, the employee would have been promoted, demoted, transferred, or laid off, the statute requires that the employee be put in such position. The statute also requires reemployment that includes seniority, status, and rate of pay the employee would ordinarily have attained. Penalties An employer who fails to comply with USERRA can be sued in federal court. The statute authorizes a court to order the employer to comply with USERRA, award the employee any lost wages or benefits, award liquidated damages, and award attorneys’ fees and costs to the prevailing employee. While most employers will gladly welcome back employees who were away on military leave, they may not be aware of all of the details associated with reemploying a returning service member. Compliance with USERRA is necessary not only to avoid legal liability but to honor those who have served our country. Glenn M. Rissman is a partner in the Business Litigation Practice Group at the law firm of Hodgson Russ LLP in Boca Raton. Mr. Rissman also practices in the areas of immigration and employment law. He may be reached at grissman@hodgsonruss.com. The above Question & Answer is provided for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice as to any specific matter. You should not act solely upon this information without consulting legal or other professional advisors. |
|
|
|