Main Menu Main Content
Noonan’s Notes Blog

About This Blog

Noonan’s Notes Blog is written by a team of Hodgson Russ tax attorneys led by the blog’s namesake, Tim Noonan. Noonan’s Notes Blog regularly provides analysis of and commentary on developments in the world of New York and multistate tax law. Noonan's Notes Blog is a winner of CreditDonkey's Best Tax Blogs Award 2017.

Contributors

Timothy Noonan 
Ariele Doolittle
Joseph Endres
Daniel Kelly
Elizabeth Pascal 
Craig Reilly
Andrew Wright 

Corporate Tax Reform FAQs

By on

Since the new corporate tax reform went into effect on January 1, 2015, the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance has been providing “general guidance” -- answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs) -- on topics of interest to taxpayers. Recently, the Tax Department clarified two administrative issues with combined filing under the new regime and issued an FAQ with respect to the proper completion of the apportionment schedule on the return.

One new FAQ addresses the problem of combined filing by corporations with different tax years. The controlling tax year will be that of the designated agent. All other corporations on the combined return will simply include their activity for their tax year ending within the tax year of the designated agent. Thus, a corporation with a fiscal year ending September 30th, will include the activities from its return for the period 10/1/15 – 9/30/16 on a combined return for the 2016 calendar year where the designated agent is a calendar year taxpayer.

The second new FAQ says the designated agent should file a single extension request for all members of a newly formed or pre-existing combined group. But a taxpayer member being added to an existing combined group must file a separate request for extension to file for the first period they will be included in the combined group. In other words, if the combined group changes and new members are added, there will likely need to be more than one extension request filed. But non-taxpayer members are never required to file their own extension request.

There is also a new FAQ regarding notice and demands being issued applying a 100 percent business apportionment factor if you complete the apportionment schedule wrong. Taxpayers should take notice of this announcement as they may be very surprised when New York State changes their apportionment percentage to 100% and issues them a bill for the additional tax.

Based on this FAQ, the Tax Department will be taking a close look at the apportionment schedule and rejecting those that are incomplete. If a taxpayer does not include receipts information, puts zero in the everywhere column of the schedule, or elects separate accounting treatment for a limited partnership without properly indicating the NYS and everywhere receipts for the partnership, the Tax Department will ignore the form, re-compute the tax due using a BAP of 100%, and issue a Notice and Demand for additional tax (as well as interest and perhaps penalties).

The FAQs may be found at the Department’s website here.

Post a comment:

*All fields are required.

Attorney Advertising
Hodgson Russ LLP

Principal Address:
The Guaranty Building
140 Pearl Street, Suite 100
Buffalo, NY 14202
Tel: 716.856.4000
Stay Connected
RSS LinkedIn

About This Firm

Hodgson Russ attorneys facilitate the U.S. legal aspects of transactions around the world. We practice in every major area of law and use multidisciplinary work teams to serve the specific, often complex, needs of our clients, which include public and privately held businesses, governmental entities, nonprofit institutions, and individuals.