Main Menu Main Content
Noonan’s Notes Blog

About This Blog

Noonan’s Notes Blog is written by a team of Hodgson Russ tax attorneys led by the blog’s namesake, Tim Noonan. Noonan’s Notes Blog regularly provides analysis of and commentary on developments in the world of New York and multistate tax law. Noonan's Notes Blog is a winner of CreditDonkey's Best Tax Blogs Award 2017.


Timothy Noonan 
Brandon Bourg 
Mario Caito
Ariele Doolittle
Joseph Endres
Daniel Kelly
Elizabeth Pascal 
Emma Savino 
Joseph Tantillo
Craig Reilly
Andrew Wright 

NY PTET Update: Treatment of Guaranteed Payments

By on

As promised, we have an update on one of the unanswered questions relating to New York’s Pass-Through Entity Tax (PTET) that went into effect last year. While we are still waiting for an official pronouncement, we have heard from other practitioners that the Department is taking a favorable position on the treatment of guaranteed payments in the context of the PTET.

Previously we raised the question of how the Department would treat guaranteed payments in the context of income partners who have no capital accounts and receive none of the partnership’s net profits. Based on a Tax Appeals Tribunal decision, Matter of Tosti, (TAT 05/12/2011), we suggested that the Department should treat these income partners receiving guaranteed payments that are reported on a Schedule K-1 as partners for purposes of the PTET. We thought that the guaranteed payments they receive should be included in calculating the partnership’s PTET, and the income partners should be entitled to a credit for their share of the PTET.

In response to a practitioner question submitted at the Department’s website specifically set up to answer PTET questions (, the Department has recently confirmed our analysis, explaining that for purposes of the PTET, guaranteed payments received by “direct partners” must be taken into account in computing the resident and nonresident pools. And according to the Department, a “direct partner” includes a partner who receives a Schedule K-1 only reporting a guaranteed payment. Capital account ownership is not required. In addition, the Department confirmed that the PTET credit should be allocated based on the partner’s income included in the PTET taxable income (which would include the guaranteed payment).

We applaud the Department for offering this Q&A service for the PTET and for the quick responses they have been providing. Stay tuned as we will keep providing updates as the Department continues to answer questions and iron out the wrinkles in the PTET in 2022.

Post a comment:

*All fields are required.

Attorney Advertising
Hodgson Russ LLP

Principal Address:
The Guaranty Building
140 Pearl Street, Suite 100
Buffalo, NY 14202
Tel: 716.856.4000
Stay Connected
RSS LinkedIn

About This Firm

Hodgson Russ attorneys facilitate the U.S. legal aspects of transactions around the world. We practice in every major area of law and use multidisciplinary work teams to serve the specific, often complex, needs of our clients, which include public and privately held businesses, governmental entities, nonprofit institutions, and individuals.