Hodgson Russ’s False Claims Act team is made up of whistleblower attorneys and paraprofessionals with substantial experience with the federal False Claims Act and the New York State False Claims Act. The team includes former federal and state prosecutors, former government attorneys, and practitioners in fields such as health care and government procurement.
Our interdisciplinary approach to False Claims Act cases is unique, and the geographic scope of our practice is noteworthy. In addition to litigating False Claims Acts cases in New York State courts and U.S. District Courts for Western, Northern, Southern, and Eastern Districts of New York, our team of attorneys has handled False Claims Act and whistleblower cases in California and Florida state courts and U.S. District Courts for the District of Massachusetts and Eastern District of Pennsylvania, as well as before the IRS. Moreover, we possess substantive depth in critical risk areas and legal disciplines, which is enhanced by our representation of both whistleblowers (relators) and defendants in False Claims Act cases. As a result, the team has a thorough understanding of those factors relevant to a successful False Claims Act case. Few other firms are capable of bringing this type of balanced experience to a case.
From 30 new whistleblower cases filed in 1987 to 753 in 2013, it is clear that whistleblowers are now driving the fight to expose the waste of taxpayer dollars through fraud against the government.
Whistleblowers accomplish this through the False Claims Act (FCA)—the federal statute that allows private individuals to bring a qui tam lawsuit against an individual or entity defrauding the government. If successful, whistleblowers, also called “relators,” are entitled to a portion of the recovered funds under the FCA. These recoveries can be substantial. In fiscal year 2013, whistleblowers recovered almost $400 million.
The importance of whistleblowers cannot be overstated, and Hodgson Russ recognizes and respects the contributions that whistleblowers make to protecting taxpayers. Hodgson Russ is one of only a few major law firms with experience representing both whistleblowers and companies accused by whistleblowers of wrongdoing in high-profile federal and state FCA cases. We believe in pursuing meritorious cases on behalf of whistleblowers. We also believe in helping companies accused of wrongdoing investigate allegations, correct any deficiencies they may encounter, and reach favorable resolutions. This rare perspective means we are exceptionally well positioned to advise you about a potential whistleblower claim.
For whistleblowers, we offer an approach to representation that is as distinct as is our perspective. We are not a “whistleblower mill” that pays little attention to the personal needs of its clients or the factual nuances of complex cases. Rather, our Whistleblower Representation Practice is composed of highly experienced lawyers who, only after careful consideration, agree to represent the claims of select whistleblowers. We do not take every case, nor do we believe the number of cases we have at any given time is a measure of our success. Instead, we select only the best cases, allowing us the ability to become fully immersed in the factual and legal details necessary to bring cases to successful resolutions. Under the False Claims Act, our whistleblower attorneys have successfully represented a variety of whistleblowers in cases involving, for example, pharmaceutical company fraud, medical device fraud, and government procurement fraud of various types.
For defendants, we offer the same interdisciplinary approach, substantive subject area depth, and successful track record. By way of example, our False Claims Act defense experience includes the successful representation of hospitals, home health agencies, physicians, accounting firms, educational institutions, and nursing homes in both criminal and civil False Claims Act investigations. We have also represented various defense contractors in matters involving allegations of procurement fraud and pricing disputes.
Our unique approach and case experience enable us to efficiently and effectively assess and either prosecute or defend False Claims Act cases in virtually every substantive area of concern. Our experience is further enhanced by close relationships with a range of forensic experts who are familiar with the collection and analysis of False Claims Act data and the assessment of potential False Claims Act damages.
Our False Claims Act team is well positioned to represent clients in False Claims Act matters, whether federal or state, in a highly sophisticated and efficient way. We encourage you to explore our website, where you can find answers to many frequently asked questions, obtain a description of the False Claims Act, and review an explanation of how the whistleblowing process works. We will not charge you for an initial consultation. If you are a whistleblower, our legal fees are paid by you only if you recover, as a percentage of that recovery.
Or call us at 716.848.1433. Dan Oliverio, who leads our False Claims Act & Whistleblower Representation Practice, can be reached via e-mail or at his home telephone number: 716.873.4090. Contact him any time, including on weekends.
Our clients work side by side with our whistleblower lawyers and staff from start to finish – in essence becoming part of the Hodgson Russ family. And, like family, we stick by our clients through every step of the False Claims Act process.
The False Claims Act
The False Claims Act, also known as the Lincoln Law, is the primary legal rule used by the U.S. government to prosecute individuals and businesses that attempt to defraud federal programs. Passed in 1863 because of the poor quality of supplies sold to the Union Army during the Civil War, the False Claims Act also protects and rewards whistleblowers who report the fraudulent activity. The law has recovered well over $35 billion since 1987, after Congress passed several important amendments. Of this amount, about $24 billion was recovered as a direct result of whistleblower involvement.
As False Claims Act attorneys, Hodgson Russ provides innovative, experienced representation to whistleblowers and others involved in government fraud cases. The federal False Claims Act gives you the power to identify government fraud and bring a lawsuit on behalf of the United States to recover ill-gotten gains through a legal device called a qui tam provision. In these cases, the False Claims Act permits the government to recover up to triple damages from those who knowingly present, or cause to be presented, false claims to a U.S. government officer or employee, or member of the U.S. armed forces, or who knowingly make, or cause to be made, false statements to get such claims paid by the United States. The law also applies to those who make false statements to conceal, avoid, or decrease an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the government, and it covers certain conspiracies to violate the act. In return, the False Claims Act provides whistleblowers with a monetary incentive of 15 to 30 percent of any recovery. Many states have their own false claims acts, which are often similar to the federal act. Visit the Taxpayers Against Fraud Education Fund’s website to view individual state’s false claims acts.
Whistleblowers’ Increasing Importance
Those who report fraud under a False Claims Act, whether federal or state, are called relators or whistleblowers. As the size of the government has grown and the complexity of its business affairs expanded, whistleblowers have exposed fraud in a multitude of industries, including health care, transportation, defense contracting, pharmaceutical sales, Medicare, Medicaid, construction, and a host of others. The U.S. Department of Justice recognizes the important role whistleblowers play in the fight against government fraud and has stepped up its enforcement efforts. Working together, whistleblowers, their counsel, and the U.S. Department of Justice have recovered billions of dollars in taxpayer money obtained by fraud.
The Whistleblower Process
Federal and state False Claims Act cases are often very complicated, and the stakes can be high for the relator. At Hodgson Russ, our whistleblower lawyers possess deep knowledge of the law and extensive experience dealing with people on both sides of False Claims Act cases, which can make or break a case and be invaluable in helping the relator and his or her family get through what can be a very trying experience.
The first step our firm takes in any potential False Claims Act case is to discuss the facts thoroughly with you. We study the allegations and applicable law, and we conduct any necessary factual investigations with your input and participation. If we determine that your case is worth further investigation, we discuss the particulars of our engagement with you. If you agree to hire us, and we agree to the representation, we execute an engagement letter setting forth the terms of our representation.
Next, we draft a complaint and other case-initiation documents as well as a disclosure statement, which contains the evidence and other factual information that supports the complaint. The complaint is filed under seal with the appropriate court, which means that it is filed in such a way that the neither the defendant nor the public knows about the case. Your identity is known only to the court and to the government at this stage, and these entities must keep your identity confidential for a certain period of time.
Under the federal statute, the complaint initially remains under seal for 60 days. That period may be, and usually is, extended to allow the government to decide whether to intervene in the case. During this period, we work with you and the government’s attorneys to help them understand and investigate the facts of the case and the evidence available to prove the allegations. Until the case is unsealed and the complaint is served on the defendant, you also share the obligation to keep the case confidential.
Once the defendant receives the complaint, the case is litigated like most other cases, with motions and discovery. Cases with merit are resolved either through settlement or by a trial. There is no typical case. Some are resolved in a year or less, some in one or two years, and others may take several years to resolve.
At the conclusion of the case, assuming a favorable settlement or successful trial and appeal, you are entitled to share in the proceeds recovered by the government in percentage amounts set forth in the applicable statute and depending on how helpful you have been to the case.
A whistleblower is awarded a share of the proceeds if the false claims act case he or she brings to the government is successful. The whistleblower’s reward – also called the relator’s share – can be between 15 and 30 percent of the government’s recovery.
Several factors affect the size of a whistleblower reward. These factors include:
- The scope of the whistleblower’s contribution to the government’s case and investigation.
- Whether the case primarily depended on disclosures from other sources (in which case the whistleblower’s reward can be no more than 10 percent).
- Whether the whistleblower planned and participated in the false claim scheme. If so, the whistleblower’s reward can be reduced to any amount the court deems appropriate.
- Whether statutory bars preclude the whistleblower from sharing in the recovery because of a criminal conviction or a jurisdictional disqualification in the case.
- Whether the government intervened in the case or whether the whistleblower pursued it alone.
Part of our job is to ensure, at the conclusion of a successful case, that our whistleblower client receives the maximum reward permitted under the law. As your counsel, we catalog and track the information and input you provide the government so we can make the case for a high share at the case’s conclusion.
Federal Retaliatory Protections
Many whistleblowers worry about retaliation. Fortunately, the False Claims Act provides whistleblowers with protection against many of the risks associated with coming forward.
First and foremost, a whistleblower’s identity remains secret while the case is under seal. When the case is no longer under seal, the False Claims Act provides remedies for whistleblowers who come forward against their employers and are subsequently discharged, demoted, suspended, “or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment” in retaliation for involvement in a False Claims Act case. If the court finds a whistleblower or other person covered by the anti-retaliatory provision of the False Claims Act was terminated or otherwise mistreated for the whistleblower’s activities, the person is entitled to reinstatement at the same seniority level; two times the amount of back pay owed, plus interest; and compensation for any special damages sustained as a result of the discrimination, such as litigation costs and attorneys’ fees.
If you are retaliated against for making a whistleblower complaint, the whistleblower attorneys at Hodgson Russ will work with you to determine whether to bring a claim for retaliation against your employer as part of your False Claims Act case.
ON THE DEFENSE SIDE
If your company is the target of an FCA investigation or defending an FCA litigation, we offer you vast defense experience as well. Our skill set is augmented by substantive knowledge across many subject areas and an understanding of how the relators’ bar works. We encourage you to call us. We are here to help.
The False Claims Act permits the government to recover up to triple damages from those who knowingly present, or cause to be presented, false claims to a U.S. government officer, employee, or member of the armed forces, or who knowingly make, or cause to be made, false statements to get such claims paid by the United States. The law also applies to those who knowingly conceal, avoid, or decrease an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the government, and it covers certain conspiracies to violate the FCA.
Importantly, the False Claims Act applies to a broad spectrum of frauds on the government. Any false claim knowingly made to the government or attempt to avoid an obligation to pay money to the government can be addressed under the FCA. In fact, the false claim does not even have to be made to the government – it can be made to a private individual or entity who then passes on the claim to the government. This is often seen in the construction industry, where contractors hire subcontractors and incorporate their claims for payment and pass them to the government project manager. If you are aware of any falsity or dishonest conduct in connection with a claim that may ultimately be paid by the government, you should consult with an attorney to see whether you have a claim.
Below are some of the common examples of fraud covered by the False Claims Act:
- Medicare & Medicaid Fraud
- Pharmaceutical Fraud
- Procurement Fraud
- Education & Grant Fraud
- Banking & Financial Services Fraud
- Securities and Exchange Commission Fraud
- Defense Contractor Fraud
- Tax Fraud
- Other Fraud
Competitors Using the False Claims Act
The False Claims Act is not only for employees or other insiders. If you are a company that believes that one of your competitors is competing unfairly by defrauding the federal government, you can also use the act to stop this conduct and obtain redress.
- Johnson & Johnson Agrees to Then-Largest False Claims Act Settlement in Risperdal Lawsuits
- Client Receives Portion of $15 Million FCA Settlement
- Defense of Whistleblower retaliation claims under OSHA in the Department of Labor
- Representation of Whistleblower in Grant Fraud Case Against Major University
- Successful Defense of Multiple Federal False Claims Act Investigations Including Corporate Representation and Representation of Business Executives.
- New York Times, October 19, 2015
- Buffalo News, October 15, 2015
- Columbia University to Pay $9 Million to Settle Allegations of False Claims in Connection With AIDS/HIV-Related GrantPress Release, October 30, 2014
- Buffalo News, October 30, 2014
- Bloomberg News, December 10, 2013
- Buffalo Law Journal Publishes Interview With Daniel C. Oliverio on Landmark Johnson & Johnson FCA SettlementDecember 2, 2013
- WBFO, November 5, 2013
- Buffalo Business First, November 4, 2013
- Buffalo News, November 4, 2013
- July 22, 2013
- Tax Analysts, January 10, 2011
- Syracuse Post-Standard, January 9, 2011
- Law360, November 3, 2010
- Government and Internal Investigations’ New Focus on Individual Accountability for Corporate WrongdoingHilton Albany, 40 Lodge St., Albany, NY, June 28, 2016
- New York, NY, January 21, 2016
- New York Law Journal, November 10, 2014
- State & Local Tax Alert, March 8, 2013
- Corporate & Securities Alert, August 24, 2011
- State & Local Tax Alert, June 3, 2011
- State Tax Notes, February 15, 2011
- Tax Stringer, February 2011
- Buffalo Law Journal, June 14, 2010
- Life Sciences Alert, January 29, 2009
- Health Alert, July 2007
Below are answers to some of the most frequently asked questions related to reporting fraud. If you have further questions, do not hesitate to contact us for more information.
A False Claims Act whistleblower, or relator, is a person who, as a plaintiff, brings a False Claims Act case on behalf of the government. These two words are often used interchangeably.
A whistleblower/relator can be an employee, a customer, an unrelated party, a competitor, or any other person or entity that learns about government billing or claim fraud. Often current employees have the best "view" of a scheme to defraud the government. These individuals have the ability to see such a scheme first hand and are typically familiar with the claims and billing process. Competitors may suspect a billing scheme is being perpetrated by another company because of pricing differentials or from information received from disgruntled employees. It is also not unusual for former employees to report a scheme to defraud. In all cases, it is important that the whistleblower/relator be the "original source" of the information; i.e., that the information is not publicly-known or known to the government in advance.
Under certain circumstances, False Claims Act cases can arise from overcharges, fraudulent non-compliance with a contract, fraudulent billings, overpayments, unrefunded amounts owed to the government, certain false certifications, and concealment of product defects. There are countless possible false claims scenarios.
Initially, yes. False Claims Act cases begin under seal, which keeps the case and the whistleblower's identity confidential. These cases are only unsealed when the court orders it. The length of the process can be as short as two months to as long as a year or more.
It may. The recent amendments to the False Claims Act's anti-retaliatory provisions cover contractors and agents of the retaliating party who are not technically "employees."
There is no typical case. Some are resolved in less than a year, some in one or two years, and others take several years to resolve. Each case depends on the complexity of its facts, defenses, and other factors.
Hodgson Russ has considerable experience on both sides of False Claims Act cases. We have defended corporate clients that have been sued under the act, and we have represented whistleblowers alleging a wide range of frauds. We know how the process works, we know the players, and we know what it takes to ensure you are represented well, that you are most helpful to the government, and that you receive the highest share of the proceeds to which you are fairly entitled. We pride ourselves on being a full-service firm with substantive knowledge and experience beyond the False Claims Act — experience in the areas and industries where fraud commonly occurs, including medical technology and pharmaceuticals, military contracting,, and transportation.
Examples include Medicare and Medicaid fraud, off-label pharmaceutical sales, and defense contractor fraud.
Yes. Your lawyers do not have to have offices near you or the company at issue. Hodgson Russ has pursued False Claims Act cases in various jurisdictions across the country.
Our legal fees are paid as a percentage of your recovery. If you do not recover, you do not have to pay our legal fees.