New York’s election laws are complex, fast-changing, and often the focus of litigation and public scrutiny. As election-related challenges continue to rise, our clients rely on us to guide them through the process with clarity and confidence.

The Hodgson Russ Election Law & Campaign Finance Practice offers comprehensive counsel across election-related issues. Whether advising lawmakers, representing candidates in high-stakes disputes, or guiding political bodies through complex compliance and reporting requirements, our attorneys have deep experience in all facets of government and a successful track record of advocacy.

Our attorneys understand how state and local election laws operate, especially in fast-moving, high-pressure political environments where outcomes often hinge on swift, informed decision-making. Our efforts allow clients to participate effectively in the democratic process while maintaining full compliance with applicable laws.

Of particular interest, ballot access in New York demands careful attention to technical requirements that can determine whether a candidate appears on a ballot. We assist candidates and committees with petition preparation, signature collection procedures, and compliance with designation and nomination requirements. When disputes arise, we represent clients in petition challenges before local boards of elections and in state court proceedings, addressing issues of signature validity, residency requirements, and procedural compliance.

Experience That Sets Us Apart

Our attorneys have advised the New York State Assembly majority, individual legislators, candidates for public office, committees, and political bodies across the state. We understand the internal processes, statutory requirements, and procedural nuances that govern New York elections because we have been deeply involved in shaping and interpreting them.

When election disputes reach the courts or administrative forums, we are zealous champions for our clients before boards of elections, state courts, and appellate tribunals. Our litigation experience includes declaratory judgment actions, Article 78 proceedings, and expedited election-related litigation where timing is critical.

We understand that election law matters often operate on compressed timeframes with high stakes. Our practice is structured to respond quickly to emerging issues and provide clear, responsive, and actionable guidance when clients need it most.

Illustrative of this, our attorneys secured decisive wins in Matter of Amedure v. State of New York, successfully defending the validity of mail‑in ballots in two years of successive litigation, prevailing before the Third Department in both instances, and again before the Court of Appeals, New York’s highest court. Through these efforts, we worked—and continue to work—to preserve the integrity of fair, transparent, and reliable elections.

This outcome protected votes in a closely watched election cycle, solidifying a clear, statewide standard that stabilizes absentee‑ballot canvassing, curbs partisan stalemates, and provides boards of elections and campaigns with a predictable framework for future New York elections.

Beyond ballot and statutory-related challenges, redistricting and the validity of electoral maps have also been the subject of legal disputes. These are often on grounds of malapportionment, vote dilution, and gerrymandering. Whether a newly drawn electoral map withstands challenge is determinative for certain elective office holders and candidates. Our firm successfully defended a county legislature in federal and state challenges to redistricting maps.

Our Services

  • Election Law & Election-Related Litigation
  • Ballot Access, Qualification & Challenges
  • Election Contests, Recounts & Judicial Proceedings
  • Redistricting and Electoral Map Challenges
  • Absentee, Mail-In & Affidavit Ballot Litigation
  • Voting Rights Act & Election Administration
  • Campaign Finance Compliance & Advisory Work
  • Strategic Counsel During Critical Election Cycles

Looking Ahead

Election law challenges are intensifying, and New York remains one of the most procedurally complex election jurisdictions in the country. Our team is prepared to assist clients through upcoming election cycles, ensuring they have experienced, steady counsel when it matters most.

Practice Leaders

Related Services

People

News & Insights

  • AlertHodgson Russ Tax-Exempt Organizations and Election Law & Campaign Finance Alert

    With the general elections just around the corner, many tax-exempt organizations – from public charities to trade associations to corporate PACs – are asking the same question: How much political activity can we engage in before we put our tax-exempt status at risk?

  • AlertHodgson Russ Election Law and Campaign Finance Alert

    The U.S. Supreme Court on September 25, 2026, issued a per curiam order granting the Government’s application to stay a district court injunction that had blocked the modified Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (“SAVE”) program. Department of Homeland Security v. League of Women Voters, No. 26A308 (Sept. 25, 2026). The stay allows the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) to resume using the modified SAVE program, which links Social Security Administration (“SSA”) records to citizenship verification requests from state and local election officials, while litigation over the program continues.

  • AlertHodgson Russ Election Law & Campaign Finance Alert

    Yesterday, on September 14, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important order which confirms that the United States Postal Service’s recent rules regarding mail-in ballots cannot be used for the upcoming 2026 election. The order denied the Government’s request to stay the preliminary injunction, which had been issued by the District Court and upheld by the First Circuit. We reported on the injunction and the anticipated Supreme Court decision in our September 14, 2026, alert. The Supreme Court’s order means the USPS Final Rule will not be in effect for the 2026 midterm elections, which are now less than 50 days away. 

  • AlertHodgson Russ Election Law & Campaign Finance Alert

    Since our August 2026 election law alert reporting that the Supreme Court had stayed the District Court’s injunction against Executive Order 14399 on standing and ripeness grounds, holding that the plaintiff states’ challenge to Section 3 of the Executive Order was not yet ripe because no final USPS rule had been issued, the litigation has moved with extraordinary speed. The Supreme Court was explicit that its ruling “does not mean that any measure taken by the Government to implement the Order will necessarily be lawful.” That final rule arrived days later. Despite the then-existing injunction, USPS issued its Final Rule on the evening of Friday, August 21, 2026. Two federal courts have now blocked it. The Trump Administration is expected to seek emergency relief from the Supreme Court. Here is what happened, what it means, and what comes next.

  • AlertHodgson Russ Election Law & Campaign Finance Alert

    New York State has some of the most complex and unforgiving deadlines for election-related submissions. Missing a deadline, even by a single day, can result in removal from the ballot, disqualification of an entire petition, objections being rejected, and possible other consequences under the law, including financial penalties. With the current election cycle underway, candidates, party committees, and their counsel must act now to comply with these deadlines and achieve critical milestones during the election calendar. 

Jump to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Election Law & Campaign Finance / News & Insights